Over the last week, all of those claims may be burning down in flames.

Phil Jones, the director of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, is stepping down from his position. In business, there are only two reasons you step down from your position, you’re either thin-skinned or you’ve done something wrong. Since I don’t know Phil Jones personally I’ll let you make that call.

Could this be the biggest cover-up since the tobacco industry’s cover-up of the link between cigarettes and cancer? Well, if these documents prove that scientists altered data to make their claims on global warming, yes.

There are billions of dollars in the global warming and that is one of the major reasons politicians, business executives, and other organizations want to be involved. Since climate change is a major political talking point, governments are making policy decisions based of this “research”. These policies that they propose and pass will cost taxpayers billions of dollars over 10, 25, 50 years.

So, if it is true that these scientists and researchers have altered data just to “prove” global warming, it will be the biggest cover-up in our lifetime.

Are there any solutions to our ever growing dependence on foreign oil? Couldn’t we just drill more here? Is alternative energy the only solution?

I just watched a speech by Malcolm Gladwell on spaghetti sauce where he spoke of about the food industry’s pursuit of the perfect spaghetti sauce, that would make everyone satisfied. The basic conclusion that he revealed is that there is no single sauce that would please everyone, but that you must produce a couple different variants of the same sauce (spicy, chunky, original) to satisfy the majority of the people. This was groundbreaking when the research came out because for decades, the food industry had a single solution that they believed would satisfy the most people and since they were content with their sales, they didn’t bother to test new recipes and didn’t innovate.

I’ve been thinking about this same concept in regards to the energy industry and how it can be applied. The basic thinking in energy is that oil is the way to go. It’s what we’ve been doing for the past 100 years and it’s what will keep us going in the future, so don’t waste any time with alternative energy, we just need to find more oil.

On the flip side, the people that are against traditional energy say that alternative energy is the only way to go, it’s what will get us off our addiction of foreign oil.

Both sides of these arguments are narrow minded. Neither of them look for solutions on the other side, or a way to intertwine them both.

So what’s the solution?

I’m going to dig a little deeper into this topic, but for now I just want to leave you with a thought. If technology was developed for automobiles to get 200 miles per gallon, would we want to spend our money and time in research and development of electric cars?

The White House website had a complete makeover just as he was being sworn into office, and with that, his policy and agenda where added to the website.

You can view Obama’s agenda for energy and environment to review his plans.

Has his agenda changed from when he was campaigning?

If you look at his energy agenda when he was campaigning, you can see there are a couple of bullet points that are now missing.

• Provide short-term relief to American families facing pain at the pump
• Enact a Windfall Profits Tax to Provide a $1,000 Emergency Energy Rebate to American Families.

Why has he taken these off his energy plan? Maybe it was just a copy and paste error by whoever handles his website, maybe it wasn’t.

Even though the price of oil has dropped considerably since the high in the summer, people still help filling up the gas tanks. With the recession, most people are still trying to recover from the high prices of oil over the summer. Who knows, maybe when the price of gasoline jumps back up he will put these bullet points back on his energy plan.

We have to note that the price of a barrel of oil closed at $42.79 the day he became president. It will be interesting to see what happens over the next couple of years when he puts his energy plan in place.

The decline in crude comes despite OPEC’s announcement it would cut production by 2.2 million barrels, on top of the two million barrels cut in September, for a total cut of 4.2 million barrels – its largest cut in its history. The cut brings the cartel’s daily supply target quota down to 24.85 million barrels a day.

Many people have become “complacent” since the price of oil has dropped more than 60% in the past 6 months, but smart businesses and people are using this time to develop alternative energy resources for their businesses and homes so they won’t feel the pain when the price rises again.

1. Capital expenditure on oil exploration and production will continue to stagnate in 2009
2. Oil price volatility to continue in the short term but likely to stabilize within a lower narrow band by the end of 2009
3. Clean energy projects will play a crucial role in the long term energy needs of the world although there will be reduced investment in 2009
4. New investments in unconventional oil and gas projects will decline in 2009
5. Coal will continue to be the highest consumed energy source in 2009 despite a shift towards nuclear and alternative sources
6. Nuclear energy will play an increasing role in meeting the global energy needs even though some new projects might be delayed in 2009
7. European countries’ will continue to increase efforts to reduce their dependence on Russian natural gas in 2009
8. Demand for natural gas to continue to increase in 2009
9. Electricity generation capacity to grow in 2009 while distribution and transmission would require further investments
10. Rise in construction costs will delay projects in the refining sector

You can purchase the complete report here

The Wall Street Journal says:

While requiring $4.4 trillion in expenditures, Google estimates that the plan would return a net savings of $1.0 trillion over its 22-year duration and create many new jobs. Work on the report was led by Jeffery Greenblatt, climate and energy technology manager for Google.org, the company’s nonprofit arm.

And the highlight of the plan is:

Greenblatt wrote that the “Clean Energy 2030″ plan would involve heavy investments in transmission capacity for wind and solar power in the “Great Plains and desert Southwest” to help cut 88% of fossil fuel use and 95% of carbon-dioxide emissions by 2030.

The Clean Energy 2030 plan covers these issues:

1. Reduce demand by doing more with less
2. Develop renewable energy that is cheaper than coal
3. Electrify transportation and re-invent our electric grid

It doesn’t surprise me that businesses and other prominent people are putting together energy plans. From the Pickens Plan, Google’s energy solution, and a number of other energy plans have been brought forth.

As I have said before, in today’s world it’s corporations and private companies, not government, that drive many big social changes. There is no time to wait on government plans because they would take too long and be inefficient. However, businesses with money on the line will find ways for clean energy to be profitable and available to everyone.

What are your thoughts on Google’s Clean Energy 2030 plan?

The investments will go towards three institutions: AltaRock Energy, Potter Drilling, and the Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab.

The funding will also go towards geothermal resource mapping, information tools, and a geothermal energy policy agenda according to CleanTechnica

A report by MIT says that geothermal energy can provide more than 2,500 the annual energy use of the United States. As the technology advances, it will be interesting to see how an infrastructure is set up to use the energy for our everyday needs.

Oil rich countries such as Russia, Venezuela, and Iran are using their control of oil to push their power around the rest of the world.

America will need to develop it’s own home-grown alternative fuel to become independent of these foreign nations and become the energy leader by example to countries around the world. The next president of the United States will need to develop and plan and execute their plan for this to succeed. I’ve already mentioned the two presidential candidates plans for energy. Both of the plans has pros and cons, but each of them will need to be revised for either one to succeed.

This plan will need to incorporate oil as a short term solution until the technologies of alternative energy are cost efficient and can be used by everyone which could still be 5-10 years down the road. We are at a critical point in the worlds history and unless the leaders take action, there will be an all out war against oil producing nations that will make the last 5 years of conflict seem like a children’s playground.

I believe we can do it! It will take effective leadership, strategic execution of an alternative energy plan, and a desire to change the future for the better.

Alternative energy is not about saving the planet, it is about saving ourselves. As George Carlin once said “The planet will be fine, it’s the people that are *&$#“. The planet has been around for billions of years, while humans have only been around for a hundred thousand years (give or take a couple thousand years). If we destroy ourselves, the planet will continue on without us, just like it always did before us.

World War III – The Energy War

Bill O’Reilly from Fox News wraps up some thoughts on his Talking Points:

We need to drill for new oil offshore while developing hybrid and electric cars. This would be included in the plan for a short term and a long term solution.

A common argument you will here from people against us blaming Saudi Arabia, Iraq, or a number of other countries for the high price of oil is that we import most of our oil from Canada. Yes, that is true, we do get most of our oil from Canada, here’s the chart that illustrates that:

However, what those same people fail to mention is that we get the majority of our oil from OPEC. OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) is a group of twelve states made up of Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Libya, Algeria, Nigeria, Angola, Venezuela and Ecuador.

OPEC takes up 7 spots in the top 10 countries that we import oil from. Even though we import most of our oil from Canada, we import 5.2 million barrels of oil per day from OPEC. The total from the top 10 is 8.4 million barrels of oil a day.

According to this chart, the U.S. imports 12.2 million barrels of oil a day, so that means just under half of our oil comes from OPEC.

This is exactly the reason why people blame OPEC for the rising costs of oil. They’ve had a monopoly on the market for the last 30 years, and as the world demands more, OPEC has a direct effect on the cost of oil.

This is just the reason why we need to end our dependence on foreign oil and develop alternative energy technologies to fuel our energy consumption.

This video can be found at NozzleRage.com, and you can sign up to receive further videos that they produce.